How Traditional Cancr Treatments Have Advanced the last 50 Years

4 Posts | Page(s): 1 

How Traditional Cancr Treatments Have Advanced the last 50 Years

by Redline on Tue Jan 23, 2018 11:49 PM

Quote | Reply
An interesting documentary. Personally,I believe in integrated treatment,both traditional and alternative. What do you think is best? https://vimeo.com/dependableproductions/theenemywithin

RE: How Traditional Cancr Treatments Have Advanced the last 50 Years

by ToddlerFather on Wed Jan 24, 2018 01:21 AM

Quote | Reply

Nowadays, traditional works best for fighting the cancer itself; alternative is best for fighting the side effects. Integrating beth gives more ample room for traditional (toxic) to kill only cancer instead of both cancer and patient. 

But what I believe will work best in the near future is personalized treatment; and in that regard, traditional is moving way faster than alternative. 

RE: How Traditional Cancr Treatments Have Advanced the last 50 Years

by Redline on Wed Jan 24, 2018 11:48 AM

Quote | Reply

On Jan 24, 2018 1:21 AM ToddlerFather wrote:

Nowadays, traditional works best for fighting the cancer itself; alternative is best for fighting the side effects. Integrating beth gives more ample room for traditional (toxic) to kill only cancer instead of both cancer and patient. 

But what I believe will work best in the near future is personalized treatment; and in that regard, traditional is moving way faster than alternative. 

I think you are right my friend. Traditional treatments have advanced and the success rates are better than what they used to be for sure. Personally, I am receiving chemo with cetuximub which is more of a targeted therapy and I have had success with it reducing the tumours on my liver. I also take with this a few evenings a week before bedtime some cannabis oil and medicinal Todicamp kerosene on a spoonful of sugar. Diet is very important and I have cut out a lot of meat and dairy produce whether this has any effect I do not know. I have also stopped drinking alcohol . I also agree, that targeted therapies are the future in the fight against cancer and should be more personalised instead of the one size fits all type treatment . In particular DNA testing for the type of cancer you have and immunotherapy therapy is the way to go of this I am convinced. Good luck to you all.

RE: How Traditional Cancr Treatments Have Advanced the last 50 Years

by ToddlerFather on Thu Jan 25, 2018 03:34 PM

Quote | Reply

What is known from traditional research is that many factors that cause cancer don't "uncause" cancer when removed. That's not to say to ingest meat, dairy and alcohol... but it is a different war. Your healthy diet will likely make you stronger to resist chemo, so it's good to do anyways, but even if some of those factors helped trigger the tumors, once they are active they are not dependent on those factors anymore. 
And prevention is indeed an area where alternative healthcare is ahead of the curve, as were the doctors in 50s/60s telling people not to smoke. 

But I recalled one occurence of a more personalized alternative treatment: Hippocrates program doesn't include but suggests doing a SpectraCell blood test to determine which micronutrients one might be lacking, and adapt one's raw diet to fix it. Brian Clement mentioned in one lecture that is unfortunate the test cost makes it unfeasible to include as a fixed part of the program, but he strongly suggests doing it. 



 

4 Posts | Page(s): 1 
Subscribe to this message board discussion

Latest Messages

View More

We care about your feedback. Let us know how we can improve your CancerCompass experience.