Dr Simoncini Cancer therapy

Any thoughts on Dr Simoncini ? 

Dr. T. Simoncini, an oncologist in Rome, Italy has pioneered sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3) therapy as a means to treat cancer.

His websight http://www.curenaturalicancro.com/

youtube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HQuODiMlUsc

his critics  http://scienceblogs.com/insolence/2008/08/a_fungus_among_us_

I did go to Rome, Italy and have Dr. Tullio Simoncini's treatment last year for breast cancer.

He is a wonderful and compassionate doctor. So far all is well with me. I was dioagnosed Dec. 2010. Now I continue treatment to boost my immune system through IVs. I chose alturnative healing because I do not believe I would have lasted long going with mainstream treatment.

I am very grateful I found Dr. Simoncini . . . I believe he saved my life.

Blessings to all,

Kizcat

Hi

Can you share what type of treatment Dr Simoncini gave you and what type of IV's are you taking now?

I too was diagnosed in Dec 2010.  Waiting for an oncotype dx test to tell me if I will need chemo.  Do not want to take chemo and I am trying to research what I can do withalternative medicine. I would not be able to go to Rome but would really appreciate any suggestions as to what he suggests.

What state was your cancer? 

Simoncini's hypothesis is that cancer is a fungus, specifically candida albicans. Science has attained the ability to genotype cancer cells for a few pathogen DNA sequences, like human papiloma virus (HPV). Doctors and labs find these sequences embedded in various cancer DNA. Follow-up interviews with the hosts reveal a high correlation between their cancers and exposure to the positive-tested pathogen. In addition, solid research pretty much proves that lots of cancer mutates from human cells. So no, it's highly unlikely that "cancer" is simply a fungus. From my reading so far Simoncini's evidence consists of treating cancer with baking soda, an alkali. He has had some success with this treatment. As with other cancer treatments, his success is limited. Does success with baking soda show that cancer is a fungus? No. That said I believe that many cancers contain lots of fungal DNA. Maybe this DNA even makes these cancers vulnerable to baking soda. On the other hand cancer could simply be vulnerable to baking soda.

I believe that candida albicans plays a large roll in creating the diabetic condition which leads to cancer. Fructose grows candida in the small intestine. The candida spore has a protein called hyphal wall protein 1 (HWP1) on its surface. HWP1 is a cross-linking protein which these spores use to adhere to the tissue transglutaminase (tTg) on the intestine wall. Because candida is so invasive, the gut's immune system learns to recognize candida by the HWP1 protein sequence. http://www.denvernaturopathic.com/news/celiac.html Upon detecting HWP1 the gut releases the protein zonulin. Zonulin makes the intestine walls porous, and washes the partially digested intestinal contents into the bloodstream. These contents contain partially digested plant proteins which mimic the body's control proteins. The immune system links the HWP1 protein sequence with the zonulin porosity response, and commits them to "innate" memory. The problem is that some foods, such as grassy grains and legumes, are also coated with HWP1. So every time a susceptible person eats these proteins their intestines preemptively dump the intestine's partially digested contents into the bloodstream. In the bloodstream these proteins cause autoimmune disease, diabetes and cancer. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12826451

Thanks for the info veggienft. Looks like I have some reading to do. Your by far more knowledgeable on this then I am. My take on this was basically that the Baking soda being very alkaline made an High Ph environment which made the cancer cells die. Could I be any where close on that?

On Apr 13, 2011 10:28 PM amf4399 wrote:

Thanks for the info veggienft. Looks like I have some reading to do. Your by far more knowledgeable on this then I am. My take on this was basically that the Baking soda being very alkaline made an High Ph environment which made the cancer cells die. Could I be any where close on that?

You're welcome. Yes, as I understand, high Ph is Simoncini's fungus/cancer killing mechanism. The body fights tooth and nail to maintain blood plasma within a narrow Ph range. So Simoncini's treatments apply the baking soda locally to tumors .....from what I've read. In other words, ingesting baking soda would not have the desired effect. And it could have undesireable effects. Reportedly in Europe Simoncini discovered the therapeutic range limit of his localized baking soda treatment when a couple of his patients died. Some medical board entertained charges that Simoncini was responsible. I'm not sure how it was resolved, but death from cancer treatment goes with the territory for most cancer doctors. So .....yawn.

It's good to see you wanting to offer both sides of the story here but re the last link you posted under ..his critics..

according to a recent CBS news article  Dr. David Gorski AKA "Orac" of Science Based Medicine (Respectful Insolence) is a front for the pharmaceutical industry with paid doctors writing articles of deception.

Read more: http://www.cbsnews.com/8618-31727_162-20049118.html?assetTyp

Good find shemay. I booked marked that one. First time I came across Orac

Hi Kizcat,

My father was recently diagnosed with a form of bladder cancer.I need dr.Tulio Simoncini's clinic adress in Rome.Can you please provide it to me?

I will acompagne my father to Rome so it will be of great help if you give me some more information about accomodation there.

Thank you